ecología de la comunicación

My Photo Name:eraser

también chapurreo blogocosas en :


top libros


radiotwitter blog. la gomba

e-learning. conocimiento en red y web colectiva

era-ser, haikus


e-learning, web colectiva, ecología comunicación y haikus (resumen total)

flamenco (estamos inactivos cambiando de servidor, y de todo)

suscríbete con feedburner

Add to Google

Leo habitualmente
<< July 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

rss feed

Ver estadísticas

Directory of Academic Blogs
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Monday, July 25, 2005
[art]Making sense of metaphors.Visuality, aurality, and the reconfiguration of American legal Discourse. Bernard J. Hibbitts

Professor Bernard J. Hibbitts *
University of Pittsburgh School of Law  Hibbitts' Home Page

"As our age translates itself back into the oral and auditory modes...we become sharply aware of the uncritical acceptance of visual metaphors and models by many past centuries."

Marshall McLuhan, The Gutenberg Galaxy

The Abstract

    Building on the work of Marshall McLuhan, Walter Ong, David Howes and other scholars of the senses, this article examines the reconfiguration of contemporary American legal discourse represented by the apparent shift from mostly visually-evocative metaphors for law and legal practice (judicial "review", "bright-line" distinctions, "penumbras" of authority, "observing" the law, "squaring" precedents, etc.) towards a greater number of aurally-evocative figures of speech (law as "dialogue", "conversation", "polyphony", etc.).

    Part I of the article establishes the importance of examining this reconfiguration in light of the nature of metaphor and its central role in thought and legal reasoning.

    Part II explores the techno-cultural, sociological and phenomenological roots of American jurists' traditional preference for visual legal metaphors. It argues that visualist legal language has both reflected and reinforced three fundamental circumstances: first, Americans' long-standing technological and cultural prejudice in favor of visual expression and experience; second, the legal and political power of certain gender, racial, ethnic and religious groups which at least in the American context have demonstrated a particular respect for visuality; and third, the corespondence between traditional American legal values and the values supposedly supported by vision itself.

    Part III of the article investigates the multiple factors behind the growing vogue of aural metaphors in American legal discourse, especially among critical theorists seeking liberation from orthodox outlooks and values. It attributes the new figurative aurality to three factors: first, American culture's technologically-stimulated interest in aural expression and experience; second, the new and self-assured "turn towards experience" being taken by a growing number of legal scholars from previously marginalized gender, racial, ethnic and religious groups which at least in the American context have demonstrated a particular respect for aurality; and third, the existence of a "fit" between the central tenets of critical jurisprudence and the supposed phenomenological biases of sound and hearing.

    The Conclusion of the article returns to the theme of reconfiguration and considers the future of both aural and visual legal metaphors in American legal discourse.  (leer más...)

Fuente: []

Posted at 08:47 am by era-ser


Leave a Comment:


Homepage (optional)


Previous Entry Home Next Entry